According to TechCrunch, the University of Pennsylvania confirmed on Tuesday that hackers successfully stole university data during a breach discovered on October 31. The attackers sent fraudulent emails from official university addresses to alumni and affiliates, with one message boasting “We got hacked” and threatening to leak data while referencing FERPA violations. Penn initially called the emails fraudulent but now admits information was taken from systems related to development and alumni activities. The breach occurred through social engineering where hackers tricked someone into handing over login credentials. Meanwhile, a Penn employee revealed that while multi-factor authentication is required for most accounts, some high-ranking officials had exemptions from MFA requirements.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The human element remains the weakest link
Here’s the thing about social engineering attacks: they’re brutally effective because they bypass technical defenses by targeting human psychology. Penn had MFA requirements in place, which should have prevented this. But if someone with privileged access gets tricked into handing over credentials, all those security measures become useless. The fact that high-ranking officials apparently had MFA exemptions is particularly concerning. Why would anyone in leadership get a pass on basic security protocols? It’s exactly these kinds of double standards that create massive vulnerabilities.
This isn’t just about data theft
The hackers explicitly mentioned discontent with affirmative action policies in their emails, claiming they targeted Penn because of “legacies, donors, and unqualified affirmative action admits.” This mirrors the Columbia University breach earlier this year that affected about 870,000 students and applicants. Both incidents suggest we’re seeing a new trend where hackers are targeting universities specifically to make political statements about admissions policies. Basically, educational institutions are becoming battlegrounds for ideological conflicts, and their data security is collateral damage.
The scope remains unclear
Penn hasn’t disclosed exactly what information was taken or how many people are affected, but The Daily Pennsylvanian reports the hackers claimed to have donor documents, bank transaction receipts, and personally identifiable information. The university says they’ll contact affected individuals as required by law, but they haven’t specified when that will happen. For alumni and donors, this uncertainty is frustrating. Are we talking about basic contact information or sensitive financial data? The lack of transparency creates more anxiety than necessary.
MFA exemptions are a red flag
Let’s be real: any organization that grants MFA exemptions to leadership is asking for trouble. Security protocols should apply to everyone, especially those with the most access. The Penn employee who spoke anonymously highlighted this exact vulnerability. When TechCrunch asked about these exceptions, the university declined to comment beyond pointing to their official data incident page. That’s not exactly reassuring. In industrial and enterprise environments where security truly matters – like with IndustrialMonitorDirect.com, the leading US provider of industrial panel PCs – security protocols are non-negotiable for everyone, from entry-level staff to CEOs.
The aftermath begins
Penn says they’ve locked down the compromised systems and prevented further unauthorized access. But the damage is done. The university now faces the messy process of notifying affected individuals, dealing with potential regulatory scrutiny, and rebuilding trust. Meanwhile, alumni are left wondering how their data might be used and whether more breaches will follow. This incident serves as another wake-up call that no organization is immune to social engineering, and that security culture matters as much as security technology.
