According to Forbes, Google’s security research conducted in July-August 2025 revealed Android users were 58% more likely than iOS users to report receiving zero scam texts, while Pixel users showed an even more dramatic 96% advantage over iPhone owners. The survey measured effectiveness of on-device scam protections including call screening and message filtering, with Android users 20% more likely to describe their device’s protections as “very effective” or “extremely effective.” However, the landscape shifted when Apple released iOS 26 on September 15, 2025, introducing similar call screening and message filtering features that narrowed the gap. The research highlights Google’s growing advantage with Pixel-first features that leave other Android manufacturers struggling to keep pace.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The Technical Foundation of Pixel’s Security Edge
Pixel’s security advantage stems from Google’s integrated hardware-software architecture that other Android manufacturers cannot replicate. Unlike Samsung or other OEMs that layer their own interfaces and modifications over Android, Pixel devices run a pure implementation where security features integrate directly with the Tensor chip’s dedicated security core. This allows for real-time processing of potential threats without the latency introduced by third-party software skins. The Google Security Blog post indicates these protections leverage on-device machine learning models that analyze message patterns and call behavior locally, ensuring privacy while maintaining effectiveness.
The Android Fragmentation Problem Intensifies
What makes this security gap particularly concerning is the accelerating fragmentation within the Android ecosystem itself. While Google touts Android’s security capabilities, the reality is that most Android devices—including Samsung’s flagship models—operate on delayed update cycles. At the time of this research, Samsung was still rolling out Android 16 to its devices, meaning the security features being measured weren’t even available to most Android users. This creates a dangerous scenario where Google’s security messaging applies primarily to Pixel devices, while the broader Android ecosystem remains vulnerable to the same threats the company claims to have solved.
Strategic Implications for Google’s Hardware Business
Google appears to be deliberately creating a tiered security experience that advantages its hardware business over its Android partners. By developing cutting-edge security features that debut exclusively on Pixel devices, Google positions its hardware as the premium, secure alternative within the Android ecosystem. This strategy mirrors Apple’s vertical integration but creates inherent conflicts with Google’s role as Android steward. The research findings essentially market Pixel’s superiority over other Android devices, potentially undermining partner relationships while giving consumers clear reasons to choose Google hardware over competing Android offerings.
Long-Term Sustainability Questions
The widening gap between Pixel and other Android devices raises serious questions about the sustainability of Google’s dual role as both platform provider and hardware competitor. If security becomes a primary differentiator—and Pixel consistently maintains a several-month advantage in deploying new protections—consumers may increasingly view non-Pixel Android devices as second-class citizens in terms of security. This could accelerate the consolidation of the Android market around Pixel devices, potentially reducing consumer choice while giving Google unprecedented control over the mobile security landscape. The company’s ability to balance these competing interests will determine whether the Android ecosystem remains vibrant or becomes merely a vehicle for Pixel dominance.
